Why Is My Throat Hurting

Trades - January 2011

To date, the results of DT_BundPP system very well. Unfortunately, there were now two ugly scenes in the trade. Even a full initial stop and the other was also the newly installed reverse signal terminated at a loss. The trades I've already posted at Facebook .

Overall, I am using the system in January but still in positive territory:

January 2011	Trades	winner	losers	percent winners	profit	loss	monthly gain			profit factor
DT_OpenRange	15	5	10	33.33%	$ 1,325.00	- $ 2,810.00	- $ 1,484.00			0.47
DT_BundPP	17	11	6	64.71%	$ 2,909.06	- $ 2,702.00 $ 207.06				1.08

The second strategy DT_OpenRange gave a negative result in January. Now this is planned and in the back so test occurred. It remains to be seen how this strategy is being developed and which have reached drawdown.

Otherwise, I'm writing a week sick and I will only observe some of the markets and work up some movies / series.

Best wishes and continued good trades

D arthTrader

Suction Cups For Cold Windows

Small update

Hello,

During the last week, I'm right where gas is the new version of the Expert Advisors to finish and test. So a fix is a lot of work, beginning with the Expert Advisor himself, through testing, to preparing the update to the site and to customize the manual for the English manual I got, fortunately, by using OLE.)

While the tests last week, I had had up to 6 open trades all of a profit 50-200 pips on the meter. That's really fun and so would I also want as soon as possible Unleashed FX-II is released.

As announced, I raise the price of the Expert Advisors by early February and then customize the site.

I wish you all a pleasant evening and a good start into the new week.

Kind regards Mike

Bearded Dragon With Red Spot

Abandoned, betrayed and sold. His apprentice in Germany is not easy!

I have written so in the previous post a bit about my test. There is no issue there, however, that burns me since the start of training under the nails.

In 2008 I finally met the decision. I need an education. Now 28, without qualifications, it goes further! That I had thought so. I wanted to get an education much earlier, but I had never married. I thought I'm too old, too long out of school, I can do it anyway. And then there was also the love of money.


I have finally an apartment to feed two cats and now and then I would have been like something to eat in the refrigerator. At the time, but I was just unemployed and received ALG I and ALG II First I tried the office to get retraining. This could, however, simply do not decide who was responsible. It dragged on indefinitely. So I decided to try it nevertheless views the free market.

I was already clear that the mere training pay is definitely not enough. But there are supportive ALG II increase. In fact, me the employment office and the Job Center lies in this belief, and so I applied. Pretty fast I was invited to discuss and ultimately adopted.

I signed the contract and requested the support ALG II Amazingly, and rather quickly, I received the notice that an increase was not possible. If it were in my case is an initial training and so I would not be entitled to apply for ALG II, but needed training aid (BAB).

Okay, I thought I could have but to say earlier, but which side I now get the money I do not really care total.

So I applied for BAB at the employment office. This was promptly granted. However, it reached the front and back and not far below the ALG II-set. On request from the Job Centre, I was just informed that it lacks jurisdiction.

I scoured the internet and found no solution. Housing allowance, which could possibly still work. Applied for and received rejection. The reasoning was that I have BAB recipients are not entitled to housing benefit.

There I was. I received a training allowance in the amount of € 500 gross in the first year.

So I had about 217 427 € net plus € BAB. This results in the aggregate a sum of 644 €.

The ALG II, including rent, etc. would have been about 744 €. There is therefore almost 100 € in cash were missing. This I had to compensate somehow. The only question is how. Moreover, I had now no longer eligible on the social ticket for 33? Euro, but had to buy a monthly ticket for trainees. However, this cost 52 euro. That is, 20 € more. Working materials for the school I also had to pay € 644 of these.

particularly "stupid" is the highway from the calculation that it is generally for 18 months is calculated. Reality is that the training content year is raised. The content development look something like this.

first Year: 427 € + 217 € = 644 €
second Year / first half of 462 € + 217 € = 679 €


subsequent application ; new BAB = 165 Euro

second Year / second half of 462 € + 165 € = 627 €
third Year / first half of 477 € + 165 € = 642 €

Finally, I had 642 euros. Of which then had to rent, electricity, gas, telephone and ticket is to be paid. A total of about 460 € without study materials for the school.

Does this mean I had about 182 euros a month. Of this I also had to have the surgery fee pay 10 € / quarter and co-payments for drugs. The special payment limits for ALG II recipients were not with me unfortunately. My attempts to find a second job failed, because I was too inflexible.

Unfortunately, I had great luck in disguise. Unfortunately, one of the most important person in my life died. He had left me some money. So I could at least for a time, covering my living with it. Unfortunately, not enough money by the end of training. As a result, are unfortunately a huge debt.

I know now by some, it was the same as me. Many even so his training has been canceled.

Now cross our government, our policies again and again, there are too few staff, too few training places or too many crashes or, or, or. Then, any training packages closed and so then everything should be good.

This is unfortunately not the case. The trainees are not considered in this equation. What good is an education if I can not even fill the fridge?

I therefore urge the policy of a complete redesign in support of training and trainees. The highway in its present form be abolished. The very basis of calculation is illogical. There is no reason for calculated to 18 months. A calculation for 12 months is appropriate as the training allowance to be raised each year eventually. A complete abolition seems more reasonable.

should also be established by law that an apprentice at least the ALG II - has set including limits on additional earnings are available. If a company is not able to afford that, then is the difference in the form of an increase by the competent authorities ALG II are made. In order to obtain

good, qualified workers, we need good training conditions.


An apprentice may be no need to worry about how long his money still enough. He has to concentrate on his training can. With a good financial base, they learn to be better and more sustainable.


And now you too. What do you think? Write me your experiences and your opinions!

Which Is The Best Labello

Hallelujah! It's done! Highly Recommended

Finally it has come. 2.5 years training as a clerk for office communication. 29.01.2010 It was time, oral examination and completed.

I must admit it really has not arrived with me. 'm Still feel I must return to school on Monday and on Tuesday back to work. But no, I can finally sleep again.

grumble a bit but I do now still.

The written examination I found now is not too bad. The question, however, was in part "all-in-pig". I really wonder whether these so-called examiners really think before they formulated the questions. Sometimes the question is so vague that a response is impossible to find without predetermined solutions.
thank God, were the most multiple-choice questions (you spell that now big or small? Me Does not matter).

Sometimes the tasks based on then any other tasks, the two sides were before it. Something like that is under normal conditions already confusing, but in an exam situation, it can take us to ever completely out of the concept.

was particularly beautiful part of the business office. They are then so-called unbound duties. That is, write, write and write even more. So it was at least the appearance. So this part has even made me nervous. Since there were questions that could be answered with 3 sets. For the answer we had but about one A4 page. Because then you get really a bit afraid that they wrote just not enough added. Whether it was the intention? I do not know.

To cap it still had two double-page so-called concept paper. No idea why that was there, I have not even needed. And everyone I asked could they start with nothing.

Perhaps it was also only a mischievous joke of Examiners. Then it was a bad joke.

What I personally found was the worst, however, this "un-Christian" time.

At 08:00 clock off we went. I also know my own experience that I definitely early at 08:00 clock, only half of the white, I think white at 12:00 clock, or at least know. This is simply because my brain more need to be awake when the rest of the body. In short, the performance is very limited. And that's not just me. there are scientific studies on this subject, which comes to the same conclusion.

Well, these are also a test situation. I know of very many who have not slept much or little. Some have even slept at all.

Why, then, becomes a date not be set, for example, for 11 or 12 clock? Since the majority is at least well rested and fit. I bet this would be reflected positively on the results. And it should not really be that of the Chamber of Commerce, that as many a good ending to achieve? Well, the Chamber of Commerce sees the apparently different.

to the oral exam, I can say really not much else. Before and after the test I found the study very nice, friendly and courteous. But during the test, I had the feeling that have just turned from Jekyll to Hyde. The task itself was not in itself bad. But then the questions that were partially, so how can I say, crap. The questions were asked so vague and ambiguous that almost every question I did not really know and sometimes could not even guess which answer is now expected. For

Example, said one investigator following:

"Imagine you are in the payroll and must now prepare disbursements What you need."

My first thought was a computer and electricity. I'm not to say that this really is the desired answer, so I drew something from my fingers. I definitely had no idea what response was expected. My answer now is: ".. Um, so first time I need the time sheets so that I can calculate the base salary then I need the tax class and any allowances"



Answer the examiner:

"Yes, that's right, but what else do you need except a computer?"

I shot right back "power" in the head. To me, however, was too banal. When I looked stupid and said only:

"Excuse me, but I do not now what you want out!"

The response of the examiner was:

"Well, what do you need for it yet, not only with electricity and a computer?"

I was still confused and thought now to the keyboard or the operating system. But I was too banal. So again look stupid and ask.

Answer:

"Well, make the on a piece of paper, calculate everything yourself, or how does the what is available take it?"

Ah, so he says. Internally, I began slowly to boil. Why does not he ask the same right after. Idiot. That was easy. I was friendly, smiled and replied.

"Oh, and you mine. Well, there is, for example, Lexware or Datev!"

response Examiner:

"Yes, exactly what else I wanted to know nothing!"

insanity, he would have to say the same, or?


Well, ultimately, I then passed that.

If so with "Millionaire" would be asked, then probably most would with 0 and only a few € 500 € to go out, but none would make it to the 32,000 Euro question. As I'm sure.

Very well, it's over and now I have peace first. Alleluia.

Maybe I see it all just too tight and I'm just "naturally confused," I sometimes think really.

What's YOUR opinion that?